Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Quiet Time with God in North America

In North American society, the church likes to emphasize the importance of spending quiet time with God. The purpose of this quiet time with God is to experience intimacy with God, and get to know God on a deeper and more personal level. It's supposed to be a part of where the relationship with God grows and flourishes. One thing I've noticed about this time with God is that the Christian Church seems to have a very... focused and narrow view about what a person and God are supposed to do during this time. 

I've found that the general idea behind quiet time with God is that the person is supposed to be alone, have a Bible plus a devotional book hand, and start and/or end the time with prayer. Don't get me wrong, this is a good way to spend time alone with God for some people. When I first became a Christian, I used devotional books and resources during my quiet time to help me understand the Bible more and to grow in my relationship with Christ. These books are good for beginners and do provide excellent insight to the Christian life at times- provided they are written by the right people.

However, I have found that this method has become more of a growing business and marketing scheme about giving good advice from the Bible than about growing a person's relationship with God. The majority of these books are targeted at youth and people in their mid-life who are living in the typical middle-income Canadian and/or American household. I have yet to see devotions for people with homosexual tendencies, people living in low-income situations, or teen mothers.  

My #1 issue with these books, however, is that they have a bad habit of not encouraging maturity of historical, biblical or theological knowledge. They do not really teach people to read a verse in its context, understand the process of biblical interpretation is knowing what it said to the original before bringing it to the 21st century, and they do not educate people in the importance of knowing and studying theology. This is a problem because for most people, devotional books are all that they use for their quiet times.

This lack of encouragement to grow in biblical and theological knowledge is leading to a lot believers staying at the beginner’s level and not really forming their own faith and their own beliefs. Instead they just regurgitate what they’ve read as solid theological arguments and correct biblical interpretations. Because of this, people do not really know how to share or to defend their faith. Without a proper understanding of the Bible, theology, and Church history, personal witnessing becomes a long string of recited verses that are incorrectly interpreted and the person will not even be able to explain what they mean and the seeker will quickly figure that what they are hearing is really reciting what other people told them to believe. They won’t even know how to address historical issues, like the Crusades, in a convincing manner. 

Have you ever heard of Girlfriends in God devotions or Susie Magazine? What about Sharon Jaynes, Susie Shellenberger, John and Stasi Eldredge, or Gwen Smith? How about the books Wild at Heart or Captivating? These people write devotions and do youth and women's ministry and have reached people all over the world. They teach people Scripture, help women and youth grow closer to God, and have gained an excellent rapport. Unfortunately, these artists and authors fall short on one important issue: They are uneducated in the interpretation and application of the Bible and biblical theology, are uneducated in Church history, and could have had a lot more systematic theological education. They don’t even know the difference between a biblical interpretation and a theological position! While I’m sure God can and is using them, they are still passing on their immature, uneducated, and incorrect views of the Bible without to millions of Christians all over the world. Would you let a person who has no education in medicine and medical practice perform surgery?  Would you trust their diagnosis of you? Then why should we be taught by people who do not have the academic qualifications to teach us about the Bible?  

For example, the book Captivating by John and Stasi Eldredge states that women have these three core desires: to be romanced, to play an irreplaceable role in a great adventure, and to unveil beauty. These traits compliment the Wild at Heart's three core desires to a man's heart: a battle to fight, an adventure to live, and a beauty to rescue. Both these books, and the authors who wrote them, have been criticized for their poor and unorthodox interpretations of the Bible and their too heavy use of interpreting the Bible in light of culture instead of vice versa. This use of culture has lead to their works reinforcing the stereotypes and values the world places on people instead of helping them to become more. 

Remember those core values men and women have? Don’t look for them in the Bible, because you won’t find them. They are found in the fairy tales and modern movies we have seen and heard. The adventure where the woman plays the irreplaceable role and where she unveils beauty is in the man's adventure he wants to live in and be the star of. Captivating and Wild at Heart are two of many examples of books and other resources, written for Quiet Time with God, that reinforce stereotypes that our society has created for its citizens to function. Not only are they VERY North American specific, but they are very poor, improper, and incorrect methods for interpreting the Bible. 

If John and Stasi Eldredge had bothered to really, and correctly, look at the Bible from cover to cover, they would never find the god who encouraged and promoted stereotypes in either Testament. To the contrary, God’s people were always called to be better and higher than the surrounding nations (OT), or the society they lived in (NT). To reinforce and encourage stereotypes and promote an ethnocentric view of North American culture is to be the opposite of what God’s people are called to be and to do. 

By the way, John and Stasi, those above “core desires” are not core desires of a man or woman’s heart. Even if a man had a battle to fight, an adventure to live, and a beauty to rescue he would STILL not be satisfied or wild at heart. If a woman was romanced, played an irreplaceable role in a great adventure, and unveiled beauty there would be still be no satisfaction for her in those things.  The one and only core desire that is at the route of any human being that is placed in everyone’s heart is to have a relationship with the Almighty Triune God of the universe. A person's life is not truly fulfilled and their core desire will never be met until there broken relationship with the Triune God is restored by accepting God’s free offer of salvation through the life, death, and resurrection of the Saviour of the world, who is God the Son in the person of Jesus Christ! 

Do I have any suggestions for my fellow brothers and sisters after the above? Of course I do. I have something to say to the authors of these resources: First, get an education that includes proper biblical interpretation, theology, and church history. Other subjects to add to the list of things you need to get educated in are stop being ethnocentric sociology and cultural anthropology. Perhaps they will teach you to not be so ethnocentric about North American culture and reinforcing stereotypes in your works. Third, encourage your readers to do the same! The readers of these resources need to mature in terms of their knowledge and study of the Bible, their knowledge and understanding of theology, and their knowledge and interpretation of Church history.  At some point you have to move on from milk to solid meat. These resources are milk and it’s time to move on from them!

 

Hebrews 5:11-14, TNIV

 11 We have much to say about this, but it is hard to make it clear to you because you no longer try to understand. 12 In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word all over again. You need milk, not solid food! 13 Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness. 14 But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.

1Corinthians 3:1-3a, TNIV

1 Brothers and sisters, I could not address you as spiritual but as worldly—mere infants in Christ. 2 I gave you milk, not solid food, for you were not yet ready for it. Indeed, you are still not ready. 3 You are still worldly.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Capital Punishment and the Bible

Does the Bible affirm or condemn the use of capital punishment? I've read a lot of comment responses to YouTube videos about capital punishment that state either/or. For those who believe that the Bible condemns capital punishment they see execution as people trying to steal a right that only God has, which is the right to decide when a person lives and when they die. There other two two arguments is that execution is just returning murder, something the Bible condemns everywhere, with murder; and people are no longer under old covenant law, but new covenant grace; therefore, capital punishment would be a step backwards from God's movement in salvation history.

What I want to say is that the above statements are true. The Bible does condemn murder, God does have the right to give and take a way life, and we are no longer under the old covenant law. However, when these truths are taken within the whole context of the Bible you'll find the Bible does not condemn capital punishment, but sees it as a permissible form of punishment for certain crimes. This can be seen from before the institution of the  Mosaic Covenant at the beginning in Genesis.

Old Testament and Capital Punishment
The one thing Christians for and against capital punishment have in common is that they believe God does have the right to put people to death. The penalty for sin, which is committing a crime against God and breaking His laws,  is death. This is seen in Genesis 2 when "the LORD God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will certainly die.”" (Genesis 2:16-17, TNIV). To sin against the LORD God is to receive capital punishment from God, the Ruler, Judge, and Law Enforcer of creation. Sometimes the sentenced is carried out immediately, such as in Ananias and Sapphira's case in Acts 5, or it is carried out when after a person lives a lifetime of sin and rejection of God's Lordship is sentenced to eternally from God in hell for eternity.

Did God pass this right on to humanity? In Genesis 9:6 God said,

Whoever sheds human blood, 
   by human beings shall their blood be shed; 
for in the image of God 
   has God made humankind.
In other words, yes God did. This is the second time God passed the right to rule and exercise law and order from Himself to humanity, the first was Genesis 1:28,  and in it God gives humanity the right to take a life if a person kills someone else. Note that this privilege is not a free for all. Only the shedding of blood, which in the Bible is taking a life, demands execution as punishment.

In the Mosaic Law this is still in effect with some changes. Under the Old Testament law people capital crimes were murder, idolatry, practising of the occult, and sexual immorality. These sins were more serious than others because they were being practised by the Egyptians and original inhabitants of the Promised Land, and the inhabitants insistence on practising them lead to God sending the Israelites to drive them out. If you want to know what life was like in those nations, read the prophets and 2Kings and 2Chronicles, because the Israelites exactly what the people God drove out of the land did and it was not fun to live there.

Clearly the Old Testament was for capital punishment as it was commanded by God to be used as punishment for certain offences under Mosaic Law. Because of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the Old Testament Law and its stipulations have been done away with and rendered null and void. Now we have the Gospel of grace where the punishment for all of our sins, including murder, were paid for by Jesus' shed blood at Calvary. Furthermore,  God's people are no longer a physical nation in a specific geographical location under God but scattered all over the world. Given these facts,  does the New Testament support or condemn the death penalty?

The New Testament and Capital Punishment

The New Testament does not come out and say it is bad but it does not say it is acceptable either. However, I do not think the New Testament can be used to voice the abolition of the death penalty wholeheartedly. While it is true that Jesus death paid the price for our sins, including all the murders ever to be committed, there is still the need for a judicial system because not everyone will accept God's offer of salvation. Furthermore there is a difference between turning the other cheek and loving your enemies in an individual believer's life, and ruling a country. The New Testament calls Christians to submit to the governing authorities, else suffer the consequences, because they were put in place to protect us from violent people.

Romans 13:1-5
 1 Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. 4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.

Paul was speaking to a church an empire that practised capital punishment on a regular basis. Therefore, Paul was indirectly affirming that governing authorities do have the right to practice capital punishment. Paul was also talking to a society that persecuted the church quite a bit during its first 300 years of existence. Why would Christians want to submit to a government that seemed to constantly attack them for their faith in Christ?

1Peter 2:13-17, 19-23
13 Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human authority: whether to the emperor, as the supreme authority, 14 or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right. 15 For it is God’s will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of the foolish16 Live as free people, but do not use your freedom as a cover-up for evil; live as God’s slaves17 Show proper respect to everyone, love your fellow believers, fear God, honor the emperor...

 19 For it is commendable if you bear up under the pain of unjust suffering because you are conscious of God. 20But how is it to your credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it? But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable before God. 21 To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.
 22 “He committed no sin,
   and no deceit was found in his mouth.”

 23 When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.

Submit to the governing authorities so that the only reason the government has for arresting believers is their faith in Jesus Christ and they will be remembered as martyrs, not condemned criminals.

From reading Scripture, I've found that it is God's people who do not have the right to execute people who do wrong. To the contrary, the highest form of discipline/punishment God's people can administer is excommunication. The goal of excommunication is not to rid the church of a criminal but to bring the offender back into the body of believers as a fellow brother or sister redeemed by God. Excommunication can be reversed, execution cannot. 

Summary
While it is true that the Bible does condemn murder and affirms that God has the right to give and take away life because He is the Creator, Ruler, and Judge of the universe, the Bible does not really argue against the use of capital punishment. Since Genesis 9:6, God has commanded the use of capital punishment for murder and later sexual immorality, idolatry, and the practising of the occult in Mosaic Law. In the New Testament, the highest form of discipline is excommunication from the body of Christ, not capital punishment, in the hopes that the person is eventually brought back. However, if a government chooses to use capital punishment it has permission to do so within reason by God, who put them there. If the governing authority abuses this calling, God will deal with them.

Revelation 6:9-11
 9 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. 10 They called out in a loud voice, “How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?11 Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the full number of their fellow servants and brothers and sisters were killed just as they had been.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

The New Covenant and Capital Punishment

The death penalty is practised in many countries all over the world including in the country south of mine, the US of A. In Canada, the death penalty was abolished in the 1960s. Not only does Canada not execute prisoners, but it won't deport people to different countries on the threat that they will or they might be executed after they get there. Recently I have been reading internet articles, watching videos, and reading blogs on the death penalty and whether it is right for the state to practice capital punishment. Now, why would I want to read about that? Well, this is a topic that has come up in conversation but I have not been given the chance to dive into it on a more in-depth level and learn about the issues. Do we, as human beings, ever have the right to take a life? Good question, and how I answer it says a lot about me as a person, a Canadian, and a Christian.

For some people, the answer to the above question, specifically in regards to the right to execute criminals, is yes. Criminals who take the lives of innocent people, especially children, should pay for it with their lives. Furthermore, they deserve to suffer and receive the same consideration and thought they gave their victims. Other people disagree mostly based on the argument that the death penalty has been and is being abused in  countries that have it, and if a person is found to be innocent after their execution it cannot be corrected.

In Christianity people fall under various factions and have used the Bible to justify both of their stand points. When I first started looking at execution and the use of lethal injection in the United States, I found a lot of comments that cite the Bible. I found that people who are against the death penalty took various passages outside of their context, that when placed in their context would fail to defend their arguments. In fact, I found the Bible approve, not condemn, the use of capital punishment in many passages. However, I can't really argue from that stand point either because a lot of the verses that call for the use of capital punishment are in the Old Testament. Now that we live in the time after Jesus' death and resurrection, God's people are not under the Old Covenant but lead by the Spirit and the OT Law has been rendered null and void.

The Bible explicitly calls for the use of capital punishment in a covenant that I am no longer under and does not explicitly for or against it in the covenant that I am under. Furthermore,  the arguments for and against capital punishment do have validity.  This has resulted in me not knowing what to think. How can I, a person who is lead by the Spirit a part from the law, speak to capital punishment that agrees with the New Covenant and speaks to the saving grace of God through Jesus Christ?

Another good question to ask and I intend to find answer before the summer is over. I know what you're thinking, "Isn't this a morbid topic to do?" It is, I won't deny that. However, an execution is probably happening right now in some country for some reason, or no reason at times, and I want to know where a believer in Christ should stand. Furthermore, it is obviously an important issue as the Bible does mention it. but we live in a morbid world at times and I want to know where I stand on some of them. I plan to post my findings on my blog during the course of my investigation. Hopefully it will not be in vain.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Agape Feasts in the Ancient Church

This Sunday LifeSprings Christian Fellowship will be meeting at the Taylor’s house for the service and having a potluck lunch following it. While this can be considered outside of the normal routine for our particular church, we are really visiting a part of the past over the course of history in the church. In the ancient church, Christians gathered in each others’ homes to do and be church. These gatherings, which were daily in the beginning, were called agape/love feasts. 

Love feasts were simple meals that the Christians celebrated and were often accompanied by the Eucharistic celebration (Eucharist is another name for communion or the Lord’s Supper). Everyone a part of God’s family living in the local community was invited to the feast, both the poor and the rich. It was a pot luck meal: People who were a part of the local church in the area brought food and drink for people to eat and they feasted. They made enough so that even the poor went away fed. Before and during the meal Scripture was read and taught and the people worshiped. Eventually the Eucharist became a permanent part of the agape feasts. As time went on and the church fell under persecution, Sunday became the only day for agape feasts and the celebration of the Eucharist. Eventually they died out because of persecution and abuses from within, such as in the church in Corinth (1Corinthians 11).
 
This Sunday we will be having an agape feast. Don’t worry, we will still be using and we will still have all the wonderful things of the 21st century. Welcome to the Ancient Church, LifeSprings Christian Fellowship!
References
Agape Feast. June 27, 2011. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape_feast#References (accessed June 1, 2011).
The Agape Feast. June 27, 2011. http://latter-rain.com/ltrain/agape.html.
White, James F. A Brief History of Christian Worship. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1993.

Friday, May 20, 2011

End Times on May 21, 2011 at 6 PM (Don't ask me in what time zone, the idiot in California didn't say)

In case you were unaware, the end of the world is supposedly tomorrow at 6 PM. There might be people freaking out around the world at this very minute because today could be our last full  day on earth as we know it. Some people are even planning to hitch a ride on dolphins, who have long known of the impending destruction of the planet earth (See the movie, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and this youtube video: 





Personally, I think that the people who supposedly "got this from the Bible" failed to read that the Bible already gave us the date. Jesus Himself, told us when this world would come to an end and when the next age and His coming would occur. It is time you found out the date our Lord gave for His return. Jesus Christ said:

"About that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son,  but only the Father." Matthew 24:36, (NIV)

"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father" (Mark 13:32, NIV).

Not the Father and the special believers or the Father and some hidden code buried in the Old Testament, but Only The Father. People have been giving "the date" ever since 500AD. I don't know how many times they have to pull a date out of a hat before they figure it out that Jesus is not coming back on their calendar.

So, my message to you is this:There is no need to panick or to be alarmed. 99% chance that the day will come and  6 PM tomorrow will get here and nothing.  No giant earthquakes, no stars falling to the sky, no ships from a Vogon constructor fleet (see Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy), no Jesus coming back, nothing. As Jesus said, "At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it." (Matthew 24:23, NIV). How can the church, or people claiming to be a part of Christ's church, make the same damn prediction over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over....over and over again and people, well some believers anyway, cannot figure it out that ONLY THE FATHER KNOWS WHEN THE END OF THE WORLD AND JESUS' RETURN IS?

I hope that Sunday morning does not result in a lot of people committing suicide because they placed their faith in a date that did not happen and sold all their stuff or something else really stupid in order to be prepare for their Lord's return. My message to them is this: First,read Matthew 24:36 and Mark 13:32. Second, no where in the Bible does Jesus or any other prophet or apostle or anyone say that in order to prepared for the second coming of Christ you need to go sell all your stuff when it is for sure at hand. 

I say that there is 99% chance that tomorrow is not the end of the world, because there is always the chance that Jesus will come back tomorrow. If He wants to come back tomorrow at 6 PM, He can go right ahead. Don't let me  stop Him. He can come after I'm done writing this blog article if He likes. Either way, it's fine by me. But the chances are already stacked against tomorrow "because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him" (Mt 24:44b). 

I rest my case. So, relax, no one's going anywhere tomorrow @ 6.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Response to the Canadian Political Parties English Debate

So, I watched the 2h debate between the Conservatives, Liberals, NDP, and Bloc Quebecois on CBC and I have to admit I was disappointed with it. I like watching debates during an election because in theory I should learn why I should vote for one party over another. If this was a one-on-one debate, then I would not mind if heard constant criticism of the current government as long as it was coupled with why I should elect a new one. However, it was 4 people debating and all I really heard was why I should not vote for one person.

As questions were asked, it started as a one-on-one debate between two of the party leaders for 6 minutes and then it expanded to the other parties. I found that one-on-one's always came back to attacking Stephen Harper, and this included the one-on-one debates he was not in! Sometimes the debate went completely off-topic that they may as well had no questions being asked at all. Furthermore, I found that it was not really a debate at all but a gang-up on Stephen Harper. To me this is not fair because a good debater should be able to acknowledge the positive and negative aspects of what or who they are opposing.

For example, I don't like the Star Wars prequels and I'll gladly defend my dislike for them in a debate. However, I can say that John William's score for them was amazing, I really enjoyed how Mustafar and Naboo turned out, and the make-up/cosmetic transformation from Chancellor to Emperor Palpatine and Anakin Skywalker to burnt up Darth Vader were very well done. I can affirm these positive things about the prequels even though I hate them.

In this debate I heard again and again why I should not vote for Stephen Harper. Yet no one acknowledged that under Harper Canada faired a lot better than any other country during the recession. It would have looked better if the parties affirmed that and then said how they could improve upon it. Instead they keep coming back to where Stephen Harper failed and why I should not vote for him. Why can't  you guys can tell me why I should vote for you and what you want to do for Canada if elected? 

The political parties need to stop bashing the current Prime Minister all the time during debates. Debating is the time to balance between the problems with the old government and why I should choose them to form the new one.On May 2 I don't who to vote for; I only know that I should not vote for Stephen Harper if the NDP, Bloc, and Liberals had their way. Well, OK, I know who I'm going to vote for but the debate really had little to no influence on my choice at all. If anything, it made me wonder if the best choice is to fire all of our politicians and find new ones.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

The Darkness- A Poem

I wrote this poem to express a day when I went through an intense spiritual battle. There is a lot of imagery in this, so don't take everything literally. I did allude to the Scriptures a bit. If you want a back story to some of the allusions, read Hosea and Ezekiel, and Romans 7-8.  Another good Scripture to read is Psalm 88. If you need specifics, please ask what something means in it, instead of making your own assumptions!

The Darkness- A Poem by Andrena LeBlanc
The darkness
It is tempting because its easy
You can hide your deeds and thoughts
Despite knowing that God will always see
And still to it I flee

The mantle of darkness cools the soul,
Hardens the heart and quickens mortality's toll
Yet is a fun and pleasurable fold
I hate it, yet I love it

I could remove what it feeds on:
Keep the lights on always and tear down whats on my walss
But something else will just come along and make me fall
Oh how tainted is my love for the darkness
I want its shadows but I hate them and their leader

How can I love what I hate?
My darkness, my sin killed Jesus
Jesus is my only love, my only purpose, my only identity
Yet, I crawl into bed with His killers

I hate sin and the dark
Yet I sleep with it and revel in its pleasures and passions
I walk away and feel sick after the encounter
Already death was conceived by it

Who are you, O world, to say darkness and sin is right?!
How dare you recruit and attempt to bring me back to your prison!
Your sin and darkness killed Jesus
If I could, I would never return to your brothel of sin, death, and darkness

The darkness, the darkness
O Lord when will I be free from it?
When will you return and set your followers free?
This thorn of darkness is so hard to bear
Yet, I have no where else to go but to You

The world can't help, it's under the dark
I can't go to the church, your bride will just show me the door
I can only go to you, the rock of my salvation

O darkness, if I could I wouldn't put up with your crap again
No more nights of forbidden passions
No more nights of conceiving darkness and death
Yet it is inevitable that I reutnr to your brothel again...

I sneak out, even though I know my Lover already knows where I am going
The adultery will happen and sin and darkness will be conceived and they will give birth to death
Sin and darkness blind me to my Lover's distance when I come home

Then the darkness turns and whispers:
"How could you betray and deny your Lover like this? Your no good!"
"You are nothing but an adulteress!"
Then I hear the Accuser say to my Father, "Your daughter just cheated on your Son!"
Look, here comes my Lover- What will He say?!

"My dear, come here."
"Yes, Lord Jesus?""What have you done?"
"I have sinned. I don't deserve to be with You anymore."

Jesus then turns to His Father:
"Father, she is with mme. It is finished."
Then He turns to the Accuser:
"you are the one who led her astray. She is Mine, not yours!"
 Then Jesus says to me:
"You are forgiven. Go and sin no more."

Thank you Lord for Your forgiveness
Thank you for dying to save me from Satan, darkness, sin, and death
Even though my sin leads me to unwanted places, I am still Yours
I will only follow You
Prayse God for the Holy Spirit, who leads me from the darkness into the light!!

O what a wretched woman I am!
Who will save from this body-
And from this world of Satan, sin, darkness, and death?
Thanks be to God, through Jesus Christ our Lord!!!

End